Venie v. Velasquez ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in
    the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the
    citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-
    generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
    Filing Date: June 17, 2024
    No. S-1-SC-34790
    D. CHIPMAN VENIE, Esquire,
    Plaintiff-Respondent,
    v.
    ANNA VELASQUEZ,
    Defendant-Petitioner.
    ORIGINAL PROCEDING ON CERTIORARI
    Carl J. Butkus, District Judge
    James Rawley, Esq.
    Albuquerque, NM
    for Petitioner
    D. Chipman Venie, Esq.
    Pro se
    Albuquerque, NM
    for Respondent
    DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF REVERSAL
    PER CURIAM.
    {1}    WHEREAS, this matter came on for consideration by the Court upon petition for
    the writ of certiorari filed pursuant to Rule 12-502 NMRA, and the Court having
    considered the petition and being sufficiently advised, issued its writ of certiorari on
    January 19, 2016, and held this matter in abeyance pending this Court’s disposition in
    Padilla v. Torres, S-1-SC-35619;
    {2}    WHEREAS, this Court issued an opinion in Padilla on February 5, 2024,
    reversing and remanding that matter to the metropolitan court for a new trial, see Padilla
    v. Torres, 
    2024-NMSC-007
    , ¶ 2, ___ P.3d ___;
    {3}   WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the issues presented in this matter are
    addressed by the Court’s opinion in Padilla;
    {4} WHEREAS, the Court, therefore, exercises its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)
    NMRA to dispose of this matter by nonprecedential order; and
    {5}   WHEREAS, the Court having considered the foregoing and being sufficiently
    advised;
    {6}   NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s January 19, 2016, order
    is WITHDRAWN as to the abeyance; and
    {7}  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court is reversed and this matter is
    remanded to the metropolitan court for a new trial in accordance with Padilla.
    {8}   IT IS SO ORDERED.
    WE CONCUR:
    DAVID K. THOMSON, Chief Justice
    MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice
    C. SHANNON BACON, Justice
    JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice
    BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Justice
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 6/17/2024

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/17/2024