United States v. Nesbit ( 2022 )

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Alexander NESBIT
Electronics Technician Nuclear Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202100325
_________________________
Decided: 30 March 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Rachel E. Trest
Sentence adjudged 20 August 2021 by a general court-martial convened
at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, consisting of a military judge sitting
alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confine-
ment for 6 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Major Brian Farrell, USMC
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
United States v. Nesbit, NMCCA No. 202100325
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. 1
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
2