United States v. Brantley ( 2022 )

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
GASTON, HOUTZ, and BURGTORF
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Harrison D. BRANTLEY
Machinist’s Mate Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202200015
Decided: 17 March 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Matthew C. Cox
Sentence adjudged 2 November 2021 by a special court-martial con-
vened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge
sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-3, con-
finement for 62 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Commander Kyle C. Kneese, JAGC, USN
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
United States v. Brantley, NMCCA No. 202200015
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. 1
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
2