United States v. Floyd ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
    Before
    GASTON, BAKER, and MYERS
    Appellate Military Judges
    _________________________
    UNITED STATES
    Appellee
    v.
    Austin T. FLOYD
    Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
    Appellant
    No. 202100095
    _________________________
    Decided: 21 March 2022
    Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
    Military Judge:
    Keaton H. Harrell
    Sentence adjudged 6 January 2021 by a special court-martial convened
    at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a
    military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduc-
    tion to E-1, confinement for 55 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.
    For Appellant:
    Captain Colin A. Kisor, JAGC, USN
    _________________________
    This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
    NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
    _________________________
    United States v. Floyd, NMCCA No. 202100095
    Opinion of the Court
    PER CURIAM:
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
    error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
    and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
    rights occurred. 1
    However, we note that the Entry of Judgment does not accurately reflect
    the disposition of the charges. 2 Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is
    entitled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the content of his
    proceeding. 3 In accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1111(c)(2), we modify
    the Entry of Judgment and direct that it be included in the record.
    The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
    FOR THE COURT:
    RODGER A. DREW, JR.
    Clerk of Court
    1   Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 
    10 U.S.C. §§ 859
    , 866.
    2 The Entry of Judgment is missing the plea and finding for the specification of one
    of the charges. See Rule for Courts-Martial 1111(b)(1) (requiring the Entry of Judg-
    ment to contain the pleas and findings for “each charge and specification referred to
    trial”) (emphasis added).
    3   United States v. Crumpley, 
    49 M.J. 538
    , 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).
    2
    UNITED STATES                                      NMCCA NO. 202100095
    v.                                                 ENTRY
    OF
    Austin T. FLOYD                                         JUDGMENT
    Lance Corporal (E-3)
    U.S. Marine Corps                                  As Modified on Appeal
    Accused
    21 March 2022
    On 6 January 2021 the Accused was tried at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune,
    North Carolina, by a special court-martial consisting of military judge sitting alone.
    Military Judge Keaton H. Harrell presided.
    FINDINGS
    The following are the Accused’s pleas and the Court’s findings to all offenses the
    convening authority referred to trial:
    Charge:       Violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice,
    10 U.S.C. § 912a.
    Plea: Guilty.
    Finding: Guilty.
    Specification:      Wrongful use of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) on
    or about 30 May 2020.
    Plea: Guilty.
    Finding: Guilty.
    Additional Charge I:        Violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military
    Justice, 
    10 U.S.C. § 892
    .
    Plea: Guilty.
    Finding: Guilty.
    3
    United States v. Floyd, NMCCA No. 202100095
    Modified Entry of Judgment
    Specification:     Violating a lawful general order by wrongfully
    transporting a privately owned loaded firearm on
    Camp Lejeune on or about 30 September 2020.
    Plea: Guilty.
    Finding: Guilty.
    Additional Charge II:      Violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of
    Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a.
    Plea: Not Guilty.
    Finding: Dismissed.
    Specification:     Wrongful distribution of LSD on divers occasions
    between on or about 8 September and on or about 30
    September 2020.
    Plea: Not Guilty.
    Finding: Dismissed.
    SENTENCE
    On 6 January 2021, the military judge sentenced the Accused to the following:
    Reduction to pay grade E-1.
    For the Specification of the Charge:
    confinement for 30 days.
    For the Specification of Additional Charge I:
    confinement for 55 days.
    The terms of confinement will run concurrently.
    Confinement for a total of 55 days.
    A bad-conduct discharge.
    The Accused has served 50 days’ pretrial confinement, which shall be deducted
    from the adjudged sentence to confinement.
    FOR THE COURT:
    RODGER A. DREW, JR.
    Clerk of Court
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 202100095

Filed Date: 3/21/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/26/2022