United States v. Harris ( 2020 )

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
GASTON, HOUTZ, and STARITA
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Cortlyn D. HARRIS
Aviation Ordnanceman Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202000102
Decided: 26 August 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Chad Temple
Sentence adjudged 27 February 2020 by a general court-martial con-
vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement
for 120 days and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Captain Daniel J. McCoy, JAGC, USN
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Harris, No. 202000102
Opinion of the Court
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C.
§§ 859, 866 (2018).
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2