United States v. Dotson ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •         United States Navy–Marine Corps
    Court of Criminal Appeals
    _________________________
    UNITED STATES
    Appellee
    v.
    Bradley D. DOTSON
    Aviation Ordnanceman Airman Apprentice (E-2),
    U.S. Navy
    Appellant
    _________________________
    No. 201800273
    _________________________
    Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
    Decided: 25 January 2019.
    ___________________________
    Military Judges:
    Commander Jonathan T. Stephens, JAGC, USN (arraignment);
    Captain Aaron C. Rugh, JAGC, USN (trial).
    Approved Sentence: Confinement for six months and a bad-conduct
    discharge. 1 Sentence adjudged 12 June 2018 by a special court-martial
    convened at Naval Base San Diego, California consisting of a military
    judge sitting alone.
    For Appellant:
    Lieutenant Commander Jacqueline M. Leonard, JAGC, USN.
    For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
    _________________________
    1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of six months
    pursuant to a pretrial agreement.
    United States v. Dotson, No. 201800273
    This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
    NMCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.2(a).
    _________________________
    Before HUTCHISON, LAWRENCE, and ELLINGTON,
    Appellate Military Judges
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
    error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are
    correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
    substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C.
    §§ 859(a), 866(c). However, we note that the court-martial order (CMO) does
    not accurately reflect the appellant’s pleas. Although we find no prejudice
    from this scrivener’s error, the appellant is entitled to have court-martial
    records that correctly reflect the content of his proceeding. United States v.
    Crumpley, 
    49 M.J. 538
    , 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998). Accordingly, the
    convening authority shall issue a supplemental CMO reflecting that the
    appellant pleaded Not Guilty to Specification 2 of Charge III.
    The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
    AFFIRMED.
    FOR THE COURT:
    RODGER A. DREW, JR.
    Clerk of Court
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 201800273

Filed Date: 1/25/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/28/2019