United States v. ROEHR ( 2021 )

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and HACKEL
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Joshua H. ROEHR
Culinary Specialist Seaman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202100240
_________________________
Decided: 13 December 2021
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Angela J. Tang
Sentence adjudged 30 June 2021 by a special court-martial convened
at Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, Connecticut, consist-
ing of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judg-
ment: confinement for 85 days and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Captain Kimberly D. Hinson, JAGC, USN
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
United States v. Roehr, NMCCA No. 202100240
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. 1
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
2