Chand v. Riggs ( 2014 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum
opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain
computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of
Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 NAREND CHAND,
3 Plaintiff-Appellant,
4 v. No. 33,689
5 JOSEPH RIGGS,
6 Defendant-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
8 Beatrice J. Brickhouse, District Judge
9 Narend Chand
10 Santa Rosa, NM
11 Pro Se Appellant
12 Montgomery & Andrews PA
13 Margaret A. Graham
14 Albuquerque, NM
15 for Appellee
16 MEMORANDUM OPINION
17 SUTIN, Judge.
1 {1} Plaintiff is appealing from a district court order granting Defendant’s motion
2 for summary judgment. We issued a calendar notice on August 11, 2014, proposing
3 to affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in support. Plaintiff has not filed a
4 memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-
5 210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey,
6 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum
7 in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar
8 notice.”).
9 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 __________________________________
11 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
12 WE CONCUR:
13 _______________________________
14 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
15 _______________________________
16 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
2