Hardesty v. State Farm ( 2011 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 EVELYN HARDESTY, 8 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9 v. NO. 30,886 10 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 11 INSURANCE COMPANY and EVELYN 12 JOY COOKSEY, 13 Defendants-Appellees. 14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY 15 Thomas A. Rutledge, District Court Judge 16 Law Office of Shawn J. Lunsford 17 Shawn J. Lunsford 18 Carlsbad, NM 19 for Appellant 20 Atwood, Malone, Turner & Sabin 21 Lee M. Rogers, Jr. 22 Roswell, NM 23 for Appellees 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION 25 VIGIL, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 AFFIRMED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2