Sproul v. Rob & Charlies ( 2011 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other 4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 5 filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 ARCHIBALD A. SPROUL and 8 LISA MCFADDEN SPROUL, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 v. NO. 31,125 11 ROB & CHARLIES, INC., 12 GT BICYCLES, INC., PACIFIC 13 CYCLES, INC., and ISHIWATA, 14 Defendants, 15 and 16 ROB & CHARLIES, INC., 17 Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, 18 v. 19 JOY INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., 20 Third Party Defendant-Appellee, 21 and 22 J&B IMPORTS, INC., QUALITY 23 BICYCLE PRODUCTS, INC., and 24 DOREL INDUSTRIES, INC., 1 Third Party Defendants. 2 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 3 Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge 4 Kenneth C. Downes & Associates, P.C. 5 Kenneth C. Downes 6 Corrales, NM 7 Steven C. Henry 8 Corrales, NM 9 for Plaintiffs 10 Hatcher & Tebo, P.A. 11 Scott P. Hatcher 12 Christopher J. Tebo 13 Santa Fe, NM 14 for Appellant 15 McClaugherty & Silver, P.C. 16 Joe L. McClaugherty 17 Tamara Safarik 18 Santa Fe, NM 19 for Appellee 20 Guebert Bruckner, P.C. 21 Terry Guebert 22 Albuquerque, NM 23 for Defendant/Third Party Defendant 2 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 VANZI, Judge. 3 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 5 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 6 DISMISSED. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 __________________________________ 9 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 10 WE CONCUR: 11 _________________________________ 12 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 13 _________________________________ 14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 3