D Padilla v. B Townsley ( 2009 )

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 DON PADILLA and GERI PADILLA, 3 Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4 v. No. 29,223 5 BRENT P. TOWNSLEY and JANELL M. TOWNSLEY, 6 husband and wife, and SPECIALTY BUILDER, INC., 7 Defendants-Appellants. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 9 Nan G. Nash, District Judge 10 Robert D. Gorman 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 for Appellees 13 Madison, Harbour & Mroz, P.A. 14 Gregory D. Steinman 15 Rachel A. Bayless 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 for Appellants 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION 19 VIGIL, Judge. 20 Defendants appealed from an order denying their motions in limine, and from 21 the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. This Court issued a 22 calendar notice proposing to dismiss the case because it was not an appeal from a final 1 order. In response to our calendar notice, Defendants have given notice to this Court 2 that they do not oppose summary dismissal in this case. Therefore, for the reasons 3 discussed in our calendar notice, we dismiss the appeal. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8 9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 10 11 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2