State v. S Madrid ( 2009 )

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. No. 28,732 5 STEVEN ALEJO MADRID, 6 7 Defendant-Appellant. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DONA ANA COUNTY 9 Mike Murphy, District Judge 10 Gary K. King, Attorney General 11 Santa Fe, NM 12 for Appellee 13 Jeffrey C. Lahann 14 Las Cruces, NM 15 for Appellant 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 SUTIN, Judge. 18 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 19 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 20 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 21 AFFIRMED. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 __________________________________ 3 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 4 WE CONCUR: 5 _________________________________ 6 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 7 _________________________________ 8 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 2