State v. Crabb ( 2016 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum
opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain
computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of
Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. No. 34,472
5 TAYLOR CRABB,
6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TORRANCE COUNTY
8 Mercedes C. Murphy, District Judge
9 Hector Balderas, Attorney General
10 Santa Fe, NM
11 for Plaintiff-Appellee
12 Taylor Crabb
13 Hobbs, NM
14 Pro Se Appellant
15 MEMORANDUM OPINION
16 VIGIL, Chief Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 _______________________________
6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
7 WE CONCUR:
8 ___________________________________
9 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
10 _________________________________
11 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
2