Nixon v. Hydrotech Services Zurich ( 2017 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 CHAZ NIXON, 3 Worker-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 35,649 5 HYDROTECH SERVICES, 6 ZURICH, 7 Employer/Insurer-Appellee. 8 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 9 Shanon S. Riley, Workers’ Compensation Judge 10 Dorato & Weems, LLC 11 Derek Weems 12 Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellant 14 Lynn & Associates, LLC 15 Phyllis Savage Lynn 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 for Appellee 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION 19 VIGIL, Judge. 1 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed 2 summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} REVERSED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 ___________________________ 10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 11 ___________________________ 12 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 2