Fust v. Wanek ( 2016 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 NORMAN PETER FUST, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 35,449 5 CATHERINE WANEK, 6 Respondent-Appellee. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 8 Mary W. Rosner, District Judge 9 Almanza Abrams, P.A. 10 Jared Abrams 11 Las Cruces, NM 12 for Appellant 13 Camunez Law Firm, P.C. 14 Rosanne Camunez 15 Las Cruces, NM 16 for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 VIGIL, Chief Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} AFFIRMED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 2