Mills v. Bancroft & Son's Trucking ( 2019 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 RAYMOND E. MILLS, 3 Worker-Appellant, 4 v. No. A-1-CA-37456 5 BANCROFT & SON’S TRUCKING 6 and REDWOOD FIRE & CASUALTY, 7 Employer/Insurer-Appellees. 8 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 9 Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge 10 Raymond E. Padilla 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 Pro Se Appellant 13 Hoffman Kelley Lopez LLP 14 Lloyd Hoffman 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellees 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 VANZI, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. 4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8 9 JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge 10 11 KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge 2