State v. Martinez ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •      This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
    Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum
    opinions.   Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain
    computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of
    Appeals and does not include the filing date.
    1         IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
    2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
    3                  Plaintiff-Appellant,
    4 v.                                                                                    No. 32,424
    5 JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ,
    6                  Defendant-Appellee.
    7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DON˜A ANA COUNTY
    8 Douglas R. Driggers, District Judge
    9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
    10 Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General
    11 Santa Fe, NM
    12 for Appellant
    13 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender
    14 Kimberly Chavez-Cook, Assistant Appellate Defender
    15 Santa Fe, NM
    16 for Appellee
    17                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
    18 FRY, Judge.
    19   {1}    The State appealed an order of the district court excluding the minor victim’s
    1 testimony in this case. Our third notice of proposed disposition suggested the
    2 possibility that this appeal is moot and/or nonjusticiable. In response, the State
    3 indicates that a nolle prosequi was filed in the district court on September 27, 2013.
    4 The State adds that due to the nolle prosequi, “the appeal may be summarily
    5 dismissed.” [Resp. 2] Since the prosecution underlying this appeal has ended, any
    6 ruling we might make on the evidentiary issue would not afford the State any relief,
    7 and the State’s appeal is therefore moot. See State v. Sergio B., 
    2002-NMCA-070
    , ¶ 9,
    8 
    132 N.M. 375
    , 
    48 P.3d 764
     (pointing out that an appeal is moot when a ruling from
    9 the appellate court will not grant the appellant any actual relief). We therefore dismiss
    10 the appeal.
    11   {2}   IT IS SO ORDERED.
    12                                                 ______________________________
    13                                                 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
    14 WE DO CONCUR:
    15 ______________________________
    16 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
    17 ______________________________
    18 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 32,424

Filed Date: 4/28/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/15/2015