Montoya v. Whitchurch ( 2014 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 MARK E. MONTOYA, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. No. 33,512 5 REISHA WHITCHURCH, and 6 JOSEPH A. NARVAIZ, 7 Defendants-Appellants. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 9 Sarah M. Singleton, District Judge 10 Mark E. Montoya 11 Rio Rancho, NM 12 Pro Se Appellee 13 Reisha M. Whitchurch 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 Joseph A. Narvaiz 16 Santa Fe, NM 17 Pro Se Appellants 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION 19 FRY, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. 2 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing 3 so has expired. AFFIRMED. 4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8 9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 10 11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2