Stevens v. UNMH ( 2014 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 SHELLY STEVENS, 3 Worker-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 33,066 5 UNMH and RISK MANAGEMENT, 6 Employer/Insurer-Appellee. 7 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 8 David Skinner, Workers’ Compensation Judge 9 Michael J. Doyle 10 Los Lunas, NM 11 for Appellant 12 Katherine E. Tourek 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellee 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 VIGIL, Judge. 17 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 18 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 1 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 2 {2} AFFIRMED. 3 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 _______________________________ 5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7 ___________________________________ 8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 9 _________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 2