Hidalgo v. Krowl ( 2014 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 MELISSA MIREYA HIDALGO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 33,146 5 DAVID ISAAC KROWL, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 8 Mary W. Rosner, District Judge 9 Grace B. Duran 10 Las Cruces, NM 11 for Appellee 12 David Isaac Krowl 13 Las Cruces, NM 14 Pro Se Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 KENNEDY, Chief Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} AFFIRMED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 ____________________________________ 7 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________ 10 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 11 _________________________ 12 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 2