Davidson v. Kurucz ( 2009 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 WILLIAM E. DAVIDSON and 8 SHARYN N. DAVIDSON, 9 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 10 v. NO. 29,586 11 ROGER J. KURUCZ, individually, 12 and as Trustee of the ROGER J. KURUCZ 13 REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, 14 Defendant-Appellee. 15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 16 Ted Baca, District Judge 17 Albuquerque Advocates, P.C. 18 Darryl W. Millet 19 Albuquerque, NM 20 for Appellants 21 Law Offices of Segal & Whittaker, LLP 22 Jeannette Martinez Whittaker 23 Albuquerque, NM 24 for Appellee 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 WECHSLER, Judge. 3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 4 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 5 and the time for doing so has expired. 6 Affirmed. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 _______________________________ 9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 10 WE CONCUR: 11 _______________________________ 12 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 13 _______________________________ 14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2