Intelliworks v. Janicke ( 2011 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other 4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 5 filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 INTELLIWORKS DEVELOPMENT, 8 INC., 9 Plaintiff-Appellant, 10 v. NO. 30,757 11 MICHAEL JANICKE, 12 Defendant-Appellee. 13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 14 Mary L. Marlowe, District Judge 15 Tal Young P.C. 16 Steven Tal Young 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellant 19 Silva, Saucedo & Gonzales, P.C. 20 Barbara J. Koenig 21 Christopher Saucedo 22 Albuquerque, NM 23 for Appellee 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION 25 KENNEDY, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. 2 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing 3 so has expired. AFFIRMED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8 9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 10 11 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 2