Orthman v. Orthman ( 2011 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other 4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 5 filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 KENNETH ORTHMAN, 8 Petitioner-Appellee, 9 v. NO. 31,260 10 KRISTI ORTHMAN, 11 Respondent-Appellant. 12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF UNION COUNTY 13 John M. Paternoster, District Judge 14 Beck & Cooper 15 Robert O. Beck 16 Clayton, NM 17 for Appellee 18 Donald Schutte 19 Tucumcari, NM 20 for Appellant 21 Kamm & McConnell, LLC 22 Terrence R. Kamm 23 Raton, NM 24 Guardian Ad Litem 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 VANZI, Judge. 3 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 5 been filed, and in fact, Appellant has filed a Consent to Proposed Disposition. 6 Mandate shall issue forthwith. 7 DISMISSED. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 __________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 11 WE CONCUR: 12 _________________________________ 13 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 14 _________________________________ 15 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 2