M Reyes v. DOT ( 2009 )

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 MARCELINO REYES, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 v. No. 28,502 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 7 Defendant-Appellee. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 9 James A. Hall, District Judge 10 Donald R. Sears Jr. 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 for Appellant 13 Montgomery & Andrews PA 14 Holly Agajanian 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 SUTIN, Judge. 19 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 20 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 21 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 22 AFFIRMED. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 __________________________________ 3 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 4 WE CONCUR: 5 _________________________________ 6 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 7 _________________________________ 8 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2