Cedrins v. Prewitt ( 2011 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other 4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 5 filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 INARA CEDRINS, 8 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9 v. NO. 30,817 10 JAMES AND SHARON PREWITT, 11 RAMESH KUMAR SHRESTHA, 12 Defendants-Appellees. 13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 14 Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge 15 Inara Cedrins 16 Chicago, IL 17 Pro Se Appellant 18 James Prewitt 19 Sharon Prewitt 20 Ramesh Kumar Shrestha 21 Albuquerque, NM 22 Pro Se Appellees 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION 24 KENNEDY, Judge. 25 Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her complaint for 26 conversion and intentional infliction of emotional distress on grounds of failure to 1 state a claim and res judicata. We issued a calendar notice proposing to dismiss the 2 appeal for lack of a final order. Plaintiff filed a memorandum in opposition in which 3 she reiterates the arguments made below and in her docketing statement, but she does 4 not address the issue of finality. 5 We correct our calendar notice to the extent we inadvertently stated Plaintiff’s 6 complaint was for civil conspiracy rather than conversion. We otherwise remain 7 unpersuaded as to the proposed outcome. We therefore dismiss the appeal for the 8 reasons stated in the calendar notice. Once a final order has been entered, Petitioner 9 may appeal in accordance with our rules of appellate procedure. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 13 WE CONCUR: 14 15 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge 16 17 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 2