Montoya v. Sandoval ( 2012 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 DAVID C. MONTOYA, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, 4 v. No. 32,377 5 CARMELA MONTOYA 6 SANDOVAL, 7 Respondent-Appellee. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY 9 Eugenio S. Mathis, District Judge 10 David C. Montoya 11 Las Vegas, NM 12 Pro Se Appellant 13 Carmela M. Montoya Sandoval 14 Las Vegas, NM 15 Pro Se Appellee 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 SUTIN, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 AFFIRMED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 __________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 JAMES J. WECSLER, Judge 2