Baca v. Karsten Homes ( 2009 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 MELINDA BACA, 8 Worker-Appellant, 9 v. No. 29,727 10 KARSTEN HOMES and 11 FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO., 12 Employer/Insurer-Appellees. 13 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 14 Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge 15 Chavez Law Offices 16 Gene N. Chavez 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellant 19 Doughty & West 20 Judd C. West 21 Albuquerque, NM 22 for Appellees 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 Bustamante, Judge. 3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar 4 notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the 5 time for doing so has expired. 6 Affirmed. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 10 WE CONCUR: 11 12 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge 13 14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2