Karpien v. Karpien ( 2016 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 DAVID KARPIEN, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 35,568 5 DAWN KARPIEN, a/k/a 6 DAWN JOHNSON, 7 Respondent-Appellee. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 9 Cheryl H. Johnston District Judge 10 The Childress Law Office 11 Sidney P. Childress 12 Santa Fe, NM 13 for Appellant 14 Trujillo Dodd, Torres, O’Brien, Sanchez, LLC 15 Donna S. Trujillo Dodd 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 for Appellee 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION 19 VIGIL, Chief Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} AFFIRMED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 M. MONICA ZAMORA Judge 2