Gomez v. Martinez ( 2023 )

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-40859 JAMES GOMEZ and RILEE FAGAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CARLOS MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE METROPOLITAN COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Frank A. Sedillo, Metropolitan Court Judge Moses, Dunn, Farmer & Tuthill, P.C. Jared A. Armijo Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Carlos Martinez Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION HENDERSON, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge WE CONCUR: J. MILES HANISEE, Judge JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge