Stump v. Minick ( 2024 )

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO No. A-1-CA-41782 ANDREW STUMP, Petitioner-Appellee, v. BLAYNE MINICK, Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Thomas F. Stewart, District Court Judge Andrew Stump Youngtown, AZ Pro Se Appellee Blayne Minick Las Cruces, NM Pro Se Appellant MEMORANDUM OPINION ATTREP, Chief Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Chief Judge WE CONCUR: KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge KATHERINE A. WRAY, Judge