Fulkerson v. James Hardie Building Products, Inc. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 HEATH VINCENT FULKERSON, Case No. 3:20-cv-0516-MMD-CLB 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 JAMES HARDIE BUILDING PRODUCTS, 9 et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Pro se Plaintiff Heath Vincent Fulkerson brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 13 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R” or “Recommendation”) of 14 United States Magistrate Judge Carla L. Baldwin (ECF No. 6), recommending the action 15 be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff had until December 16, 16 2020 to file an objection. To date, no objection to the R&R has been filed. For this reason, 17 and as explained below, the Court adopts the R&R, and will dismiss the action with 18 prejudice. 19 The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 20 recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party 21 fails to object to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court is not required to 22 conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas 23 v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 24 1116 (9th Cir. 2003) (“De novo review of the magistrate judges’ findings and 25 recommendations is required if, but only if, one or both parties file objections to the 26 findings and recommendations.”) (emphasis in original); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory 27 1 || Committee Notes (1983) (providing that the Court “need only satisfy itself that there is no 2 || clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). 3 Because there is no objection, the Court need not conduct de novo review, and is 4 || satisfied Judge Baldwin did not clearly err. Here, Judge Baldwin recommends dismissing 5 || the action with prejudice because Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint curing the 6 || deficiencies outlined in the screening order (ECF No. 4) after being warned that failure to 7 || do so would result in the issuance of a Recommendation that the action be dismissed for 8 || failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 6 at 1.) The Court agrees with Judge Baldwin. Having 9 || reviewed the R&R and the record in this case, the Court will adopt the R&R in full. 10 It is therefore ordered that Judge Baldwin’s Report and Recommendation (ECF 11 || No. 6) is accepted and adopted in full. 12 It is further ordered that this action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state 13 || aclaim. 14 It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court enter judgment in accordance with this 15 || order and close this case. 16 DATED THIS 21% Day of December 2020. 17 18 | ( 19 MIRANDA M. DU 20 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28