Blandino v. Sisolak ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA KIM BLANDINO, Case No.: 2:20-cv-01337-GMN-NJK 11 Plaintiff(s), v. ORDER 13 STEVE SISOLAK, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. In particular, the Court has received mail returned 16} as undeliverable to Plaintiff. Docket No. 25. “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of 17|| keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 18] 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the 19] local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification of any change 20|| of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 22 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by January 23/8, 2021. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN A 24| RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: December 22, 2020 □ 27 f a fen Nancy J. Koppe 28 United States Magistrate Judge