Pozdol v. City of Las Vegas ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 DEBRA POZDOL, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00877-JCM-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order Oy v. [Docket No. 26] 10]| CITY OF LAS VEGAS, ll Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s expert disclosure. Docket No. 26. Any response must be filed by December 15, 2020, and any reply must be filed by December 17, 2020. 15 The Court also notes that the instant motion implicates the most recent attempt by the 16|| parties to extend deadlines, which was denied without prejudice for failing to provide the basic 17|| information necessary to fully evaluate such request. See Docket No. 25; see also Docket No. 23 (setting hearing and identifying information that needed to be presented at that hearing).! Any 19] renewed stipulation for extension must be filed by December 14, 2020, and must provide the information identified at Docket No. 23. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: December 10, 2020 ee A ei Nancy J..Koppe 24 United States Magistrate Judge ' Tt is a basic aspect of legal practice that a denial without prejudice means that the 26] underlying request can be renewed. That is precisely the import of using the “without prejudice” modifier. E.g., Ceja v. Scribner, 2016 WL 3996152, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2016). It is unclear 27\| why counsel apparently believes otherwise with respect to the denial without prejudice of the stipulation to extend. See Docket No. 26 at 4 (“this Court has already indicated that it is unwilling to move deadlines”).