Davis v. Bluth ( 2021 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3) RAYMOND DAVIS, Case No.: 2:20-cv-01696-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 11] JACQUELINE BLUTH and ADAM GILL, 7 Defendant 8 9 On May 4, 2021, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss plaintiff 10|| Raymond Davis’s amended complaint with prejudice because he failed to timely file a second 11}}amended complaint. Davis did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 181/11) is accepted. Plaintiff Raymond Davis’s amended complaint (ECF No. 4-1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. 21 DATED this 28th day of May, 2021. 22 ANDREWP.GORDON. SS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE