Lopez v. Taino ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8], JUAN LOPEZ, Case No. 2:19-cv-01178-MMD-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), v. ORDER 11! G TAINO, et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket Nos. 31-33. “A party, not the district 14] court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey 15] v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 16] 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written 17] notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case- dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 19 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 20|| September 7, 2021. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN 21] DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: August 17, 2021 LZ ZEN \ oo Nancy J.“Koppe 25 United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28