Burns v. Hanf ( 2021 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Case No.: 2:19-cv-722-JAD-NJK 4 || David Burns, 5 laintiff Plainti Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio 6 and Denying Motion for Preliminary v. Injunction 7 g M.D. Hanf, et al., 9 Defendants [ECF Nos. 27, 31] 10 1] D On August 2, 2021, the magistrate judge recommended that I deny Plaintiff David B Burns’s motion for a preliminary injunction in this civil-rights action.! The deadline for any 14 party to object to that recommendation was August 16, 2021, and no party filed anything. “[N]o 15 review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are 16 filed.”” Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 18 Recommendation [ECF No. 31] is ADOPTED in its entirety. Burns’s motion for a preliminary 19 injunction [ECF No. 27] is DENIED. Choe 20 US. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey 5 Dated: August 22, 2021 22 23 | aa 25 ECF No. 31. 26 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 97 || U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 28