Skinner v. Russell ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 RODERICK SKINNER, Case No. 3:21-cv-00318-MMD-CLB 7 Petitioner, ORDER v. 8 PERRY RUSSELL, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 11 On August 2, 2021, the Court denied Petitioner Roderick Skinner’s application to 12 proceed in forma pauperis and directed him to pay the filing fee in order to proceed with 13 his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 5.) Skinner has 14 complied with that order and paid the required fee. (ECF No. 6.) The Court has reviewed 15 Skinner’s petition (ECF No. 1-1) pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, and the petition shall be filed 16 herein and served upon the Respondents. 17 A petition for federal habeas corpus should include all claims for relief of which 18 Skinner is aware. If Skinner fails to include such a claim in his petition, he may be forever 19 barred from seeking federal habeas relief upon that claim. See 28 U.S.C. §2244(b) 20 (successive petitions). If Skinner is aware of any claim not included in his petition, he 21 should notify the Court of that as soon as possible, perhaps by means of a motion to 22 amend his petition to add the claim. 23 In addition, Skinner has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 1-2.) 24 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3006A(a)(2)(B), the district court has discretion to appoint counsel 25 when it determines that the “interests of justice” require representation. There is no 26 constitutional right to appointed counsel for a federal habeas corpus proceeding. See 27 Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999 F.2d 425, 428 1 v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th 2 Cir. 1984). However, counsel must be appointed if the complexities of the case are such 3 that denial of counsel would amount to a denial of due process, and where the petitioner 4 is a person of such limited education as to be incapable of fairly presenting his or her 5 claims. See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. 6 Here, Skinner’s petition is sufficiently clear in presenting the issues that Skinner 7 wishes to bring. Also, the issues in this case are not particularly complex. As such, it does 8 not appear that appointment of counsel is warranted in this instance. Thus, Skinner’s 9 motions for appointment of counsel will be denied. 10 The Clerk of Court is therefore directed to file Petitioner Roderick Skinner’s petition 11 for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1-1) and motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 12 1-2) and electronically serve the petition and a copy of this order on Respondents. 13 The Clerk of Court is further directed to add Aaron Ford, Attorney General of the 14 State of Nevada, as counsel for Respondents and to provide Respondents an electronic 15 copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notice of Electronic Filing 16 to the Office of the Attorney General only. 17 It is further ordered that Respondents shall have 60 days from the date of entry of 18 this order to appear in this action, and to answer or otherwise respond to Skinner’s 19 petition. 20 It is further ordered that if Respondents file an answer, Skinner shall have 60 days 21 from the date on which the answer is served on him to file and serve a reply. If 22 Respondents file a motion to dismiss, Skinner shall have 60 days from the date on which 23 that motion is served on him to file and serve a response to the motion to dismiss, and 24 Respondents shall, thereafter, have 30 days to file a reply in support of that motion. 25 It is further ordered that any additional state court record exhibits filed herein by 26 either Skinner or Respondents shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying 27 the exhibits by number. The CM/ECF attachments that are filed further shall be identified 28 by the number or numbers of the exhibits in the attachment. The hard copy of any 1 || additional state court record exhibits shall be forwarded—for this case—to the staff 2 || attorneys in Reno. 3 It is further ordered that Skinner’s motions for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1 4 || 2 & ECF No. 7) are denied. 5 DATED THIS 23% Day of August 2021. 6 `` 7 J LL . ) 8 CHIEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 3:21-cv-00318

Filed Date: 8/23/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/25/2024