Razaghi v. Razaghi Development Company, LLC ( 2019 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 KORY RAZAGHI, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:18-cv-01622-GMN-CWH 5 vs. ) 6 ) ORDER RAZAGHI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ) 7 LLC, et al., ) ) 8 Defendants. ) 9 ) 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kory Razaghi’s (“Plaintiff’s”) Motion for Leave to 11 File Third Amended Complaint, which Plaintiff filed as unopposed. (Mot. for Leave, ECF No. 12 117). On August 2, 2019, the Court issued a Minute Order requiring Defendants Ahmad 13 Razaghi, Razaghi Development Company LLC, Razaghi Healthcare LLC, and Razaghi 14 Healthcare LLC (Arizona) (collectively “Defendants”) to file either a notice of non-opposition 15 or a status report indicating their intent to oppose the Motion. (Minute Order, ECF No. 118). 16 On August 5, 2019, Defendants filed a Notice of Non-Opposition indicating that they do 17 not oppose Plaintiff’s Motion. (Notice of Non-Opposition, ECF No. 119). Due to litigation 18 commitments, however, Defendants’ counsel requests until September 20, 2019, to file an 19 Answer or Motion to Dismiss to the Third Amended Complaint. (Id.). Defendants’ counsel 20 represents that Plaintiff does not oppose this extension. (Id.). 21 In light of the foregoing, and for good cause appearing, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Third Amended 23 Complaint, (ECF No. 117), is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file the Third Amended Complaint 24 separately on the docket by August 16, 2019. 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have until September 20, 2019, to file an Answer or Motion to Dismiss to the Third Amended Complaint. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss, (ECF Nos. 51, 72), are 2 DENIED as moot. See Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 3 2015). 4 5 DATED this __7___ day of August, 2019. 6 7 ___________________________________ 8 Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25