Johnson v. Social Security ( 2019 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA VICKI JOHNSON, Case No.: 2:18-cv-01987-APG-EJ Y 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 9] SOCIAL SECURITY, 7 Defendant 8 On August 1, 2019, Magistrate Judge Foley recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Vicki Johnson failed to file a second amended complaint and did not respond to 10}| Judge Foley’s order to show cause. ECF No. 9. Johnson did not file an objection. Thus, I am obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 13} report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made’); United States v. Reyna- 141 Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 15}| magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 16]| otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Foley’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 9) is accepted. Plaintiff Vicki Johnson’s amended complaint (ECF No. 5) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 22nd day of August, 2019. 21 Ce 22 ANDREW P. GORDON 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE