- 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 RYAN BATEMAN, Case No. 2:20-cv-02049-APG-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), Order 10] v. [Docket No. 50] 11! HAWKER ENERGY, INC., et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending resolution of 14] their motion to dismiss. Docket No. 50; see also Docket No. 28 (motion to dismiss).' Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 53; see also Docket No. 38 (response to motion to 16] dismiss). The deadline for filing a reply has expired. See Local Rule 7-2(b). Considering the 17} governing standards, Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), the 18} Court finds that a stay of discovery is appropriate in this case. 19 Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. In the event resolution of the 20] motion to dismiss does not result in the ending of this case, a joint proposed discovery plan must 21} be filed within 14 days of the issuance of that order. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: September 8, 2021 24 ZR (ony Nancy ns 25 United States‘Magistrate Judge 26) ———___ ' The Court previously granted a motion to stay discovery in this case. Docket No. 20. 27| Defendants’ initial motion to dismiss was later granted with Plaintiff being afforded an opportunity to amend. Docket No. 22. The instant motion to stay discovery is predicated on Defendants’ 28] motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Docket No. 28.
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:20-cv-02049
Filed Date: 9/8/2021
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/25/2024