Rowe v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department ( 2021 )

IL □□□□ er shen _COUNSELIPARTIES OF RECO Michael Rowe | ser 26 a | ive cusIR Tel: (702) 379-4850 DISTRICT OF NEVADA RT vegasm@icloud.com BY: DEPT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MICHAEL ROWE, Pro Se Case No.: 2:21-cv-00724-JAD-BNW Plaintiff, VS. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al. Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION (ECF 24) Plaintiff Michael Rowe moves for clarification of the Court’s recent Order granting Defendants Motion to Stay Discovery in this case. See United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 793 F. Supp. 2d 164, 168 (D.D.C. 2011) (explaining that, while “there is no Federal Rule of Civil Procedure specifically governing ‘motions for clarification,” federal courts frequently will “rule on a motion for clarification without resort to {Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] standards"). See also Potter v. District of Columbia, 382 F. Supp. 2d 35, 42 (D.D.C.2005) (example of such a ruling). 1} On 09/24/2021 the Court granted the defendants Motion to Stay Discovery due to the Plaintiff's failure to properly oppose that motion. The plaintiff was anticipating attending the hearing on 11/16/2021 to oppose that motion and establish a timeframe as to when discovery can proceed. Since the hearing has was and there is no timeframe established in either the defendant’s Motion to Stay Discovery, or the Courts Order on 9/24/2021. The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court clarify its order, so that discovery can proceed in under a few months, or provide the plaintiff some type of timeframe. There is no reason for the Plaintiff not to have some type of timeframe as to when this case will proceed with discovery. DATED this _27 day of September 2021. MICHAEL ROWE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the _ 27 day of September 2021, I served the foregoing LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT on the following person(s) in the manner(s) listed below: Via U.S. Mail LYSSA S. ANDERSON (Nevada Bar No. 5781) RYAN W. DANIELS (Nevada Bar No. 13094) KRISTOPHER J. KALKOWSKI (Nevada Bar No. 14892) 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Attorneys for Defendants LVMPD, Fred Boncy, Harrison Porter and Robert Steinback Michael Rowe Pro Se 2300 E. Silverado Ranch Blvd 1025 Las Vegas NV, 89183 vegasm(@icloud.com Order 702-379-4850 IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 24 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is advised that discovery in this case is stayed until the Court decides Defendants' motion to dismiss at ECF No. 9. If the case is not dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, a joint proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order will be due 14 days after ECF No. 9 is decided. IT IS SO ORDERED