Williams v. Nevada Department of Corrections ( 2021 )

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 TERRANCE EUGENE WILLIAMS, Case No. 3:21-cv-00187-HDM-CLB 6 Petitioner, 7 v. ORDER 8 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 11 This habeas matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s failure 12 to file an amended petition on the Court’s required 28 U.S.C. § 13 2254 petition form and a copy of the prisoner’s trust account 14 statement for the six-month period prior to filing as well as 15 consideration of Petitioner’s Motion Pertaining to Pertinent 16 Matters (ECF No. 8) and Motion Inquiring about Appointed Counsel 17 (ECF No. 9). 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 On May 24, 2021, the Court entered an order directing 20 Petitioner Terrance Eugene Williams, a pro se Nevada prisoner, to 21 file his petition on the Court’s required 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition 22 form and to either pay the standard five dollar ($5.00) filing fee 23 or file a complete application for leave to proceed in forma 24 pauperis (“IFP”) within 30 days. ECF No. 4. On June 9, 2021, 25 Petitioner filed a Motion for Appointment of Counsel1 (ECF No. 5) 26 and another IFP application (ECF No. 6). 27 1 The Court will defer consideration of the motion for appointment of 28 1 On July 6, 2021, the Court instructed Petitioner to file an 2 amended petition on the Court’s form within 30 days and file a 3 copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six-month period 4 prior to filing, or alternatively pay the $5 filing fee within 30 5 days. To date, Petitioner has not complied with the Court’s order. 6 Petitioner’s IFP application is incomplete. Petitioner must 7 include a copy of the prisoner’s trust account statement for the 8 six-month period prior to filing.2 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); LSR 1- 9 1, LSR 1-2. Petitioner will have one final chance 30 days from the 10 date of this order to submit a copy of the prisoner’s trust account 11 statement for the six-month period prior to filing to complete his 12 IFP application or alternatively pay the $5.00 filing fee. 13 In addition, to date, Petitioner has not filed an amended 14 petition on the Court’s required 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition form as 15 instructed in the Court’s previous order. Local Rule LSR 3-1 16 requires Petitioner to file his petition on the Court’s required 17 § 2254 petition form. Instead of complying with the local rule, 18 Petitioner used a state court form. Petitioner must use the 19 required form to state his claims in order to provide the court 20 with necessary information to conduct preliminary review of the 21 petition. Accordingly, Petitioner must file an amended petition on 22 the Court’s form within 30 days of the date of this order. 23 Petitioner must clearly title the amended petition as such by 24 writing the word “AMENDED” immediately above “Petition for a Writ 25 2 An IFP application is complete with the appropriate supporting 26 documentation: (1) a financial certificate signed by an authorized prison official, (2) a copy of the prisoner’s trust account statement for the six- 27 month period prior to filing, and (3) a financial affidavit and acknowledgement signed by the prisoner showing an inability to prepay fees and costs or give 28 1 of Habeas Corpus” on page 1 in the caption, and he must place the 2 case number, 3:21-cv-00187-HDM-CLB, in the designated space. Under 3 Local Rule 15-1, the amended petition must be complete in itself 4 without reference to previously filed papers. Thus, the claims and 5 allegations that are stated in the amended petition will be the 6 only matters remaining before the Court. Any claims or allegations 7 that are left out of the amended petition or that are not re- 8 alleged will not be considered. 9 II. Motion Pertaining to Pertinent Matters (ECF No. 8) 10 Petitioner appears to request a status regarding his parole 11 hearing. Federal law provides two main avenues to relief on 12 complaints related to incarceration: (1)a petition for habeas 13 corpus, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254, 2255; and  (2) a complaint under 14 the Civil Rights Act  of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Muhammad v. 15 Close, 540 U.S. 749, 750 (2004); s e e also Nettles v. 16 Grounds, 830 F.3d. 922, 927 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc). 17 Federal habeas statutes allow a state prisoner or pretrial 18 detainee to challenge “the validity of any confinement or to 19 particulars affecting its duration.” Muhammad, 540 20 U.S. at 750 (“Challenges to the validity of any confinement or to 21 particulars affecting its duration are the province of habeas 22 corpus.”). Where the claims at issue would result in “immediate 23 release if successful,” such claims fall “within the core of habeas 24 corpus” and therefore must “be brought, if at all, in 25 habeas.” Nettles, 830 F.3d. at 927–28 (citing Preiser v. 26 Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 487 (1973)). 27 “If the prisoner’s claim challenges the fact or duration of 28 the conviction or sentence, compliance with AEDPA is mandated, 1 while if the claim challenges any other aspect of prison life, the 2 prisoner must comply with the PLRA.” Nettles, 830 F.3d. at 3 934. 4 Habeas relief is not available for “probabilistic 5 claims,” i.e., where success on the claims “could 6 potentially affect the duration of confinement” or is “likely to 7 accelerate the prisoner’s eligibility for parole.” Nettles, 830 8 F.3d. at 933–34 (quoting Docken v. Chase, 393 F.3d 1024, 1031 (9th 9 Cir. 2004); Bostic v. Carlson, 884 F.2d 1267, 1269 (9th Cir. 10 1989), overruled by Nettles). 11 Here, Petitioner brings a petition for writ of habeas corpus 12 under § 2254. The Court is not apprised of Petitioner’s parole 13 eligibility or parole hearing status. Accordingly, the Court 14 denies Petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 8). 15 III. Motion Inquiring about Appointed Counsel(ECF No. 9) 16 As provided in the Court’s previous order, the Court deferred 17 and will continue to defer consideration of the motion for 18 appointment of counsel until Petitioner has fully complied with 19 this order. Accordingly, the Court denies Petitioner’s motion (ECF 20 No. 9). 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 22 1. Petitioner’s Motion pertaining to Pertinent Matters (ECF 23 No. 8) is DENIED. 24 2. Petitioner’s Motion Inquiring about Appointed Counsel (ECF 25 No. 9) is DENIED. 26 3. Within 30 days of the date of this order, Petitioner must 27 file a copy of his inmate trust account statement for the 28 six-month period prior to filing. Alternatively, 1 Petitioner will pay the $5 filing fee within 30 days. 2 4. The Clerk of Court is instructed to MAIL Petitioner a blank 3 form petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 4 U.S.C. § 2254 with instructions. 5 5. Petitioner must file an amended petition on the Court’s 6 form within 30 days. Petitioner must clearly title the 7 amended petition as such by writing the word “AMENDED” 8 immediately above “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus” 9 on page 1 in the caption, and he must place the case number, 10 3:21-cv-00187-HDM-CLB, in the designated space. 11 6. Petitioner’s failure to comply with this Order by (a) 12 filing an amended petition, and either (b) submitting a 13 statement of his inmate trust account for the six-month 14 period prior to filing to complete his IFP application, or 15 (c) paying the filing fee within 30 days will result in 16 the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without 17 further advance notice. 18 DATED: this 29th day of September, 2021. 19 oral 2 Ht HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28