Villalobos v. Swenzl ( 2019 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ALFONSO VILLALOBOS, Case No.: 2:19-cv-01229-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 6] DSWENZL, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On December 2, 2019, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Alfonso Villalobos has not updated his address. ECF No. 6. Villalobos did not 10}| object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 15} otherwise” (emphasis in original)). Also, Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation was 16} returned in the mail. 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 6) is accepted and plaintiff Alfonso Villalobos’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 18th day of December, 2019. 21 22 ANDREWP. GORDON. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE