Clark v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 MICHAEL EDWARD CLARK, 11 Case No.: 2:19-cv-02178-JAD-NJK Plaintiff(s), 12 ORDER v. 13 [Docket No. 4] LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE 14 DEPARTMENT OFFICERS, 15 Defendant(s). 16 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for a screening of Plaintiff’s complaint. 17 Docket No. 4. The motion is predicated factually on the assertion that Plaintiff was an inmate at 18 Clark County Detention Center when he filed suit and that he remains an inmate there. Id. at 1. 19 Plaintiff’s address identified on the docket is a street address, however, and not the address of 20 Clark County Detention Center. See also id. at 3 (certificate of mailing). Moreover, Plaintiff does 21 not appear to be an inmate at Clark County Detention Center based on a review of its online inmate 22 search tool. See, e.g., Daniels-Hall v. Nat’l Educ. Ass’n, 629 F.3d 992, 998-999 (9th Cir. 2010) 23 (courts may take judicial notice of information on government websites). 24 25 26 27 28 1 In light of the above, Defendants are hereby ORDERED to file, by December 23, 2019, a 2|| declaration in support of their representation as to Plaintiff's status as an inmate. The declaration 3|| must include, inter alia, Plaintiff's inmate ID number. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: December 19, 2019 6 Nancy J. Koppe\, 7 United States-Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28