Brooks v. Moynihan ( 2019 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MALCOLM BROOKS, Case No.: 2:18-cv-01104-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 10] BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On December 2, 2019, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Malcolm Brooks has not complied with the court’s order or taken any other action in the case. ECF No. 10. Brooks did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings which objection is made’); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (‘‘the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 15}| de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 10) is accepted and plaintiff Malcolm Brooks’ complaint (ECF No. 1-2) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 19th day of December, 2019. 20 Z. ANDREWP. GORDON. 09 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23