Scott v. Cox ( 2020 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Case No.: 2:17-cv-00702-JAD-BNW Steven L. Scott, 5 we Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio 6 v. 7 8 James Cox, et al., [ECF Nos. 53, 81] 9 Defendants 10 11 In this civil-rights case, Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler recommends that I deny 12 || Plaintiff Steven L. Scott’s motion to file an amended complaint as mot in light of her various 13 || September 10, 2020, orders.! The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was 14 || September 24, 2020, and no party filed an objection. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate 15 || judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”? Having reviewed the R&R, I 16 || find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 18 || Recommendation [ECF No. 81] is ADOPTED. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion For Leave to Amend [ECF No. 53] 20 ||is DENIED as moot. q CP 4 21 aspen U.S. District Judge/Jennifer A./Dorsey 22 Dated: September 26, 2020 23 24 25 ECE No. 81. > Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 28