Sharkey v. Williams ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 James Sharkey, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00253-KJD-DJA 8 Petitioner, Order 9 v. 10 Brian Williams, et al., 11 Respondents. 12 13 This is a federal habeas proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 brought by James Sharkey 14 challenging his state court conviction for battery constituting domestic violence. Before the court 15 are Sharkey’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 42) and respondents’ requests for 16 additional time (ECF Nos. 50, 57) to file an answer to the remaining claims in Sharkey’s habeas 17 petition. 18 Sharkey filed a previous motion for appointment of counsel when he filed his habeas 19 petition initiating this case. ECF No. 7. The court denied that motion based on finding that the 20 “interests of justice” standard under 18 U.S.C. §3006A(a)(2)(B) had not been met. ECF No. 3. 21 Sharkey has not advanced compelling reasons for this court to deviate from that decision. In 22 addition, he has demonstrated the ability to adequately present his factual and legal arguments in 23 this case. See LaMere y. Risley, 827 F.2d 622, 626 (9th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, his renewed motion for appointment of counsel will be denied. 3 Respondents have twice requested additional time to file an answer to the remaining 4 claims in Sharkey’s habeas petition. ECF Nos. 50, 57. With both requests, respondents provide good cause for extending the court’s deadline. In addition, the court is satisfied respondents did not file the requests for the purpose of unduly delaying these proceedings. 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Sharkey’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF 8]| No. 42) is DENIED. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ motions for extension time (ECF Nos. 50, 57) to file an answer to the remaining claims in Sharkey’s habeas petition are GRANTED. Respondents shall file their answer within 45 days of the date this order is entered. Sharkey shall 12|| have 60 days from the date on which the answer is served on him to file and serve a reply. 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 43, 45) to file a response to Sharkey’s motion for appointment of counsel are GRANTED nunc 15]| pro tunc as of their respective filing dates. 16 Dated: December 10, 2021. ™ Jal U.S. District Judge Kent J. Dawson 18 19 20 21 22 23