Walker v. Henderson Police K9 ( 2023 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3) JACOHEN WALKER, Case No.: 2:22-cv-00652-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 9] 6|| HENDERSON POLICE K9 and HENDERSON POLICE, 7 Defendants 8 9 On January 6, 2023, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this action 10} because plaintiff Jacohen Walker failed to pay the filing fee or apply to proceed in forma 11} pauperis despite being given multiple extensions of time to do so. ECF No. 9. Walker did not 12} object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those 14] portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review 16]| the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 17} otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 18 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation 19] (ECF No. 9) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is 20] instructed to close this case. 21 DATED this 25th day of January, 2023. g-— 23 _ ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE