Johnson v. Homegoods, Inc. ( 2023 )

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 STEPHANIE JOHNSON, 6 Case No. 2:22-cv-01893-JCM-NJK Plaintiff, 7 Order V. 8 [Docket No. 16] 9] HOMEGOODS, INC., 10 Defendant. 11 12 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to extend discovery deadlines.’ Docket 131 No. 16. The parties seek a 60-day extension to the current discovery deadlines. Jd. at 1. The 14! parties submit that good cause exists to extend the discovery deadlines because they are trying to 15] minimize discovery costs prior to a mediation. Jd. at 2. 16 The parties, in reality, seek a stay of discovery. However, they fail to address any of the 17| relevant standards. See id at 1-2. To the extent the parties seek a stay of discovery, a request must 18] be filed identifying the governing standards and providing meaningful discussion as to how they 19] are met. See, e.g., Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013); Arik v. 20] Meyers, 2020 WL 515843, at *1 (D. Nev. Jan. 31, 2020). 21 Accordingly, the parties’ stipulation to extend discovery deadlines is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 16. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: January 27, 2023 25 PRSS\ Fe. Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge 27 28] In the future, the parties must ensure that they use the correct case number on all filings.