Hall v. Sunrise Hospital & Medical Center ( 2023 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Demarko Lashawn Hall, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00459-JAD-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and v. Recommendation Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, [ECF Nos. 1, 7] 7 Defendant 8 9 The magistrate judge has reviewed this action and recommends that this case be 10]| dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.! The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation expired three days ago, and no party filed anything or asked to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”? Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 15 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 16|| [ECF No. 7] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter 17} jurisdiction. The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 1] is DENIED 18}}as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE 19] THIS CASE. q] Y 20 (% Ly phe 21 US. DistrictFadge Dorsey May 25, 2023 22}; —__ ECF No. 7. 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 USS. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).